Free Energy Forum – Perpetual Motion Motor of Magnets Feasible?

Magnetic perpetual motion generation observations by Rene Meijer. Topics discussed included:

The Finsrud gravito magnetic device analyzed. Inspired by Milkovic is investigated rotation by oscillation for building, testing capacity and mechanics of a self running overunity magnet motor system involving gravity. Testing a possibility of a loop with the Milkovic principle of driving a flywheel with a two phase pendulum.

A successful replication of a perpetual motion magnetic pendulum of George Delk, even though in style of Tinselkoala. Johnson/Mylow replication with a disc of seventy centimeters with a plate of zinc on top of non magnetic material, another configuration is tried. ALME magnet motor replication, originally there were projected neodynium magnets and a slider operating on rollers, we managed with what we had to produce a working model.

In a five version of the IPMM, Dave Squires drive is tested. Small demonstration on how to remove properly magnets from loudspeakers. Testing a principle of Hamel’s gravito magnetic generator.

IPMM four perfects a loop concept of magnetic alternation and shows that magnetic over unity is not found with a design like this. Rotation on rotation overunity free energy experiment with IPMM cakra spinner. MAN stands for magnetic alternating non device, a device not running on a material input, which shows further development of an experiment into possible operation of an intelligently pulsed magnet motor.

Perpetual motion is basically defined as motion that continues indefinitely without any external source of energy. Allegedly this is impossible in practice because of friction. Supposedly this violates first and or second law of thermodynamics.

Do you think that creating a perpetual motion machine is feasible? Also, do you think that creating a perpetual motion motor out of magnets is feasible as well??

Want to host your own Internet radio show? Reality UnKnown is looking for individual radio hosts that support being free, peaceful, and prosperous. Apply now and broadcast your voice for FREE.

Energy Management – Do You Think Free Energy is Possible?

The necessity of a new energy policy:

A modern energy question is one of great importance. Survival of mankind is at stake. We cannot, as we clearly see at beginning of the twenty first century, continue using fossil fuels.

We need to switch over to sustainable energy sources, partly because of a fact that resources of oil, gas and other fossil fuels are getting depleted, but also because of administrative and military conflicts that are associated with a striving for a new world order.

Two policies of winning sustainable energy:

Concerning sustainable energy there are two options: an indirect and direct winning of sustainable energy. An indirect winning of energy freely available in nature consists of transformation of a natural and materially perceptible impulse into electricity with help of notably solar cells, windmills and hydroelectric power stations.

The paradigmatic conflict:

A paradigmatic conflict between direct winning of energy at one hand and an existing transformation of raw materials in association with a secondary sustainable technologies at another hand has a long history. A conflict resulted in destruction and repression of work of early pioneers in this field like Nikola Tesla (1846-1943), the inventor of alternating current, and Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957), who made several discoveries in this line of research . After the death of Tesla were his papers confiscated by the american government and kept secret because one didn’t want his inventions in a field of weapons technology to end up in wrong hands?

An invention to think with one’s hands:

Paradigm means thought model, a frame of mind in which all kinds of models and theories find their explanation and method of measurement. A paradigm can thus be a certain apparatus, a certain machine, referring to certain relations of forces in nature. Thus are next to machines of clocks and communication means, also those found of energy converters representing a certain frame of mind, a certain paradigm.

The paradigm of the relative ether:

An actual, ruling paradigm may be called a paradigm of relativism which is based upon old formulations of Einstein wherein he declared that an assumption of an existence of ether was ‘unnecessary’. Relative of morality and matter is not wrong on itself, to contrary, but an -ism thereof is wrong when we along with it propose that there wouldn’t exist anything absolute anymore. That was never Einstein’s intention and this interpretation annoyed him.

Intelligent pulse driven magnet motor drive principle:

Explanation of a magnetic motor principle, which is a combination of Hamel’s principle for magnetic spin and Bhaskara’s and DaVinci’s gravity wheel designs. This magnetic flywheel requires a minimal intelligent impulse to run with speed. Thus, may in harnessing negative energy, gravitons of ether, or zero point, or vacuum energy if you like, lead to over unity devices, UFO like anti-gravity with higher speeds or even dimensional shifting with super speeds, and thus add to a solution for the world’s energy and transportation problems.

Reference is made to some work of Howard Johnson, John Bedini, and Tom Bearden. Do you think free energy is possible?

Jimmy Sabori – Was His Noble Gas 500 Horse Power Engine Possible?

Jimmy Sabori’s Papp Engine

A two cycle engine demonstrates power output up to five hundred horse power on a dynamometer; and a one cycle engine with a plexiglas cylinder shows ignition of noble gas in a vacuum process, which current physics says is impossible. The Sabori inert gas vacuum engine. According to a video, a forerunner to this engine was brought to the United States by a Hungarian, Joseph Papp.

Sabori joined him in nineteen eighty five, investing a large sum of money in a joint venture. Mr. Papp refused to share, per a contract agreement. That case ended in court in Tulsa, Oklahoma in nineteen ninety eight.

In a settlement, that judge instructed Papp to share with Sabori and to share ownership. Papp would attain fifty one percent, while Sabori would acquire other forty nine percent. Joseph Papp died that next year of colon cancer, taking that technology to his grave with him, having destroyed all formulas and equations, therefore leaving Sabori with nothing.

During his last five years, per a time of that video footage, Mr. Sabori had developed one and two cylinder engines. A one cylinder engine includes a plexiglas sleeve for viewing a reaction. Sabori is said to have subsequently developed a technology superior to Papp, using small amounts of Helium, Neon, Argon, Krypton, and Xenon all within a sealed vacuum.

This engine produces no exhaust, no combustion, and requires no cooling system. A two cylinder engine, which is being perfected and which is fully functional, puts out as high as three hundred fifty horsepower at low revolutions per minute. This same engine puts out five hundred horse power at higher revolutions per minute, such as at seven hundred revolutions per minute.

According to mainstream science, it is not possible for inert gasses in a vacuum to produce substantial force. A Sabori video shows otherwise.