White Phosphorus – is Another World Really Possible in Iraq?

Another World is Possible in Iraq. Not often heard are some voices of peace cried out from people who’s lives are destroyed by occupying forces. Those who are intent on creating divides among people of the world use bigotry, and prejudice, as guises to justify their inhumane actions while embezzling resources.

Occupier occupied is a collection of studies documenting dissenting voices from a generation of people deeply affected by injustices levied by weak men, far removed from their victims. These studies dispel some occupiers propaganda which suggests that these people are all terrorists and gives back a microphone to a collection of voices never heard, only sanitized. Fallujah White Phosphorus.

Fallujah, Iraq. This documentary shows that weapons of mass destruction were used by George W. Bush and the American government military against a country unable to feed itself, who is desperately trying to survive against insurmountable odds, yet in violation to international law, the American gunslinger George W. Bush lashes out with perhaps a most atrocious weapon of mass destruction any one human could suffer. This documentary provides evidence that if put before a jury, George W. Bush would be convicted to a death penalty in his own country!

Was white phosphorus used on Iraqi civilians during an invasion of Iraq by the United States military in 2003 and beyond? White phosphorus is a colorless, white, or yellow waxy solid with a garlic like odor. It does not occur naturally, but is manufactured from phosphate rocks.

White phosphorus reacts rapidly with oxygen, easily catching fire at temperatures ten to fifteen degrees above room temperature. White phosphorus is used by the United States military in various types of ammunition, and to produce smoke for concealing troop movements and identifying targets. There have been many allegations of white phosphorus use in Iraq.

Do you think it is possible white phosphorus was used on Iraqi’s during an American invasion?

Police Misconduct – Reasons Why You Should Never Talk With Police

James Duane, a professor at Regent law school and a former defense attorney, tells you why you should never agree to interview with police and explains why innocent people should never talk to police. George Bruch from the Virginia Beach police department responds to professor James Duane’s presentation. Legally, police are allowed to lie during police interrogations also known as interviews.

Police often times pressure people into admitting guilt, even when they are innocent. Police are trained to try to get a written confession. Even defense attorneys like James Duane will often times recommend an individual obtain legal counsel, even if they are innocent.

A verbal and or written confession can become devastating to an individual. There are cases when individuals have convictions overturned based on false confessions brought about by coercion. However, this might be an exception rather than a rule.

Mr. Duane’s overall assertion is that individuals should have an attorney or lawyer present when interacting with Police. Also, individuals can assert their fifth amendment right which allows them protection from self incrimination. Innocent people do get jail time and or sentenced believe it or not because they failed to obtain legal counsel to defend them.

With America’s Police state ever becoming more terrorist in my eyes, avoiding self incrimination is all too important. Even if you cannot afford paid legal counsel, a public defender at least is a witness of what was being discussed. James Duane brings up this point of having a witness, even juveniles having a parent as a witness is described.

The legal system can destroy even an innocent persons life. Police are not immune to corruption either. With a persons physical freedom at stake, why wouldn’t people take interacting with Police more seriously?

Curious about whether or not refraining from talking to Police is good legal advice?

Abstract Concepts – Are Some Abstractions Used to Brain Wash You?

Abstract concepts are plentiful in the current system that humans use to survive by. Are some of these abstractions brain washing or at a very least cause arguments? Abstract concepts like communism, socialism, money, love, etc. may seem innocent on a surface, but perhaps can become problematic.

My quick explanation of what kind of abstract ideas is if I can literally put word labeling something in a tool box then that is a real object. How does one put communism into a tool box? Communism is reification which is basically a man made concept of a certain ideology or actions.

When people argue over these concepts that really aren’t real, then is that not problematic in nature? Also, some people kill each other over arguments about ideas, concepts, philosophies, etc. I take this a step further and think that it is perhaps possible that some abstract concepts are used intentionally to brain wash people.

One such abstract concept I speak of is money. To me money is a man made concept with tokens and ink paper used to make this illusion come to life so to speak. Is money really valuable or is it a mind trick where by your brain gives something man made an arbitrary value.

Money might also be relative where by some people think some items are worth more tokens or ink paper. Obviously, people trade tokens and ink paper for real tangible items ie. food, furniture, automobiles, etc. My point is that why is it necessary to have this intermediary fake items in order for some ends to justify some means?

Money is just one example of reification being used in language or in other words abstract delusions of grandeur perhaps. Taxes, interest, debt, and even nations, counties, states are all forms of abstract concepts. I often think that perhaps a lot of these man made concepts are used nefariously to get people in society to buy into certain ideologies, pun intended.

Zeitgeist – Is This Movement a Communist Socialist False Positive?

Zeitgeist: Addendum, attempts to locate root causes of some pervasive social corruption, while offering a solution. This solution is not based on politics, morality, laws, or any other establishment notions of human affairs, but rather on a modern, non superstitious based understanding of what we are and how we align with nature, to which we are a part. This work advocates a new social system which is updated to present knowledge, highly influenced by a life long work of Jacque Fresco, whom is “ex” military and the Venus Project.

Zeitgeist films were produced and directed by Peter Joseph Merola. These films covered some events of September eleven two thousand one, United States federal reserve system, religion, etc. One key solution is a resource based economy, which is a big part of the Venus Project.

Zeitgeist heavily criticizes a current system of government, military, politics, formal law, etc. Peter Joseph Merola released the first Zeitgeist documentary film in two thousand seven. Conspiracies such as September eleven two thousand one, federal reserve banking system, religion used as a control mechanism, etc. are covered in this film.

Not like other film documentaries that point out perhaps obvious flaws with a current human system, Zeitgeist actually discusses potential solutions to these problems.

This film series starting with Zeitgeist the film, Zeitgeist Addendum, and ending with Zeitgeist Moving Forward is a trilogy. Peter Joseph Merola was going to make a fourth film entitled Zeitgeist Beyond the Pale, but he later decided to end this film series as a trilogy. This trilogy has had millions of views on the Internet as all three films are available for free.

A Zeitgeist movement and Venus Project later cut ties, after some controversy and a decision made that both organizations would remain individual in nature. Also, Gregory Wantz, former radio host of Zradio an officially sanctioned Zeitgeist movement, was recorded possibly threatening someone’s life. Is Zeitgeist movement just another false positive communist socialist movement?

News Media – Was American News Media Complicit With 911 Cover up?

September Clues

News media had a central role in pulling off a September 11, 2001 psychological operations. That operation involved airing on television a substitute, computer generated version of reality. It has temporarily succeeded to sell to the world a preposterous tale of nineteen young terrorists using hijacked airliners to attack the United States of America.

This longstanding research has established a falseness of images shown on Live television on September 11, 2001, as well as all subsequently released video material. A September 11, 2001 hoax is definitively exposed by methods revealed. A large number of casualties was also reported to generate public outrage and support for illegal wars of aggression.

However, September Clues research has determined that those alleged victims were fictitious identities mostly or entirely created within a digital realm. The 9 11 hoax and a phony “War on Terror” are definitively exposed by methods revealed. September clues is a controversial film documentary with a premise that some events of September 11, 2001 were a false flag inside job.

What perhaps makes this documentary controversial, even with in a “truth” movement is that it claims that no planes were used on September 11, 2001 and that those alleged planes in Manhattan were computer generated. Also, a common theme in this 911 documentary is that News media in the United States was complicit in covering up what really happened. The official story claims nineteen terrorist’s with box cutters hijacked planes and crashed them into both twin towers.

September Clues refutes this as false with analysis of video coverage used on September 11, 2001 by the mainstream media. This video documentary film was created by Simon Shack. Was manufactured fake video transplanted into news coverage on September 11, 2001?

Another thing questioned in this film was alleged amateur video coverage of some events of 911. Do you think it is possible media fakery was used in news media coverage of those events of September 11, 2001?

Unmanned Air Vehicle – Was Military Drone Used on Pentagon on 911?

Painful Deceptions

This video documentary shows that a conspiracy is much larger than the United States government wants you to believe. An aircraft that hit the United States military Pentagon appears to be a remotely controlled drone. Explosives appear to have been placed in both towers before an attack to cause those towers to disintegrate into dust.

Building seven was a forty seven story, steel framed building that disintegrated at five thirty PM Eastern time, also from explosives. A twenty third floor was mayor Rudy Giuliani’s “Emergency Command Center”, which had its own air supply. This appears to be a command center for an attack on New York Cities world trade center towers.

Plus, an explanation of turbofans, explosives, the Alfred P Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City bombing, a media that Americans mistakenly refer to as our “Free Press”, and why deception is a main weapon in this war to control us. Painful Deceptions is a movie documentary with a premise that some events of September 11, 2001 was a false flag inside job. Eric Hufschmid created and produced this film documentary.

This documentary claims that a remote controlled drone was used to damage the United States’ Pentagon instead of flight seventy seven. Explosives were used to control demolition the twin towers in Manhattan, New York was an explanation, instead of the United States government military’s official explanation. Building seven falling in it’s own foot prints was explained as another controlled demolition.

Painful Deceptions covers other facets of “The System” but primarily concentrates on some events of September 11, 2001. Interestingly enough some events in Oklahoma City in 1995 was also covered. This event too was questioned as another false flag inside job, contrary to what the United States government military has claimed.

Think it is possible that an Oklahoma City bombing in 1995 and some events of September 11, 2001 were false flag inside jobs?

Controlled Demolition – Were Twin Towers Controlled Demolition?

What is “911 Mysteries”?

Ninety minutes of pure demolition evidence and analysis, laced with eye opening witness testimonials. Moving from “the myth” through “the analysis” and into “the players,” careful deconstruction of an official story set right alongside clean, clear science. A September 11, 2001 picture is not one of politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple physics.

How do you get a ten second one hundred ten story pancake collapse? A movie that might actually reach our complacent mainstream. No agenda.

No finger pointing. Just facts and “mysteries”. Look at that.

Think about this. A story of people: Willie Rodriguez’s strange recollection of noises on a thirty fourth floor. Who was up there, bumping around?

Scott Forbes’ similar story, weeks before those towers fell. A story of blasting itself. Here’s how shaped charges slice through steel beams to control a way they fall.

A 911 Mysteries move documentary about some events of September 11, 2001 basically covers a premise that the Manhattan twin tower buildings were controlled demolition. It does not try to figure out whom perpetrators were. This documentary goes into detailed analysis of how those twin towers were brought down by controlled demolition charges.

The director of 911 Mysteries was Sofia Shafquat. Her documentary even covered a history of those now defunct one hundred and ten story sky scrapers. 911 Mysteries is a first documentary claiming that some events of September 11, 2001 was an inside job false flag, that I personally witnessed.

I viewed it on a cable access station in Denver, Colorado in mid 2000’s. Let’s just say I was shocked while viewing it for that very first time. Overall, I thought this video documentary made some very good points.

After getting over my initial paranoia, after watching this film, that completely questioned the United States government military’s official story pertaining to September 11, 2001, I decided to study 911 on my own.

Against Iraq War – September 2001 Used as Pretext Against Iraq?

ZERO: an Investigation Into 9/11

This documentary has one central thesis, that an official version of events surrounding some alleged attacks on September 11, 2001 can not be true. This feature documentary from Italian production company Telemaco explores some latest scientific evidence and reveals dramatic new witness testimony, which directly conflicts with the United States government’s account. Featuring presentations from intellectual heavy weights; Gore Vidal, and Nobel Prize winner Dario Fo, this film challenges assumptions surrounding those 911 attacks.

In words of the Italian daily newspaper, Il Corriere Della Sera, “What results is a sequence of contradictions, gaps, and omissions of stunning gravity”. An importance of this film can not be overstated. If its thesis is correct, some justification for going to war in Iraq is built on a series of outrageous lies.

Were those events of September 11, 2001 in Manhattan used as justification to invade Iraq? Initially, Iraq was demonized as having weapons of mass destruction and nothing to do with September 11, 2001. Did the United States government military then use this false flag inside job to attack Iraq and other parts of the world?

This documentary covers World Trade Center seven tower crashing down into its own foot prints so to speak about eight hours after World Trade Center towers one and two fell. Many Americans or people world wide for that matter are still not aware of this fact. World Trade Center seven falling was only televised on television on September 11, 2001.

Also, there is some what of a consensus, by some people, that building seven as it is referred to was controlled demolished. How does a forty seven story skyscraper building fall down with very minimal collateral damage and a few insignificant fires? Building seven perhaps is one most significant events of September 11, 2001 that may have been and continues being over looked by media outlets.

Loose Change 911 – Are You Not Quite Sure if 911 Was Inside Job?

Loose Change 9 11: an American Coup is dramatically narrated by Daniel Sunjata of FX’s Rescue Me, and an outspoken advocate for first responders. Loose Change 9 11: an American Coup first examines mysterious and infamous events that reshaped world history. From a Reichstag fire in 1933 that catapulted Hitler to dictatorship, to the Gulf of Tonkin Incident in 1964 that led to a Vietnam War, and then takes viewers on a turbulent journey through several pivotal moments in history before delving into a most significant catastrophe in recent memory, some events of September 11, 2001.

Loaded with powerful, new footage and in depth interviews with likes of Steven Earl Jones, an American physicist who has discovered undetonated explosive material in multiple samples of dust from World Trade Center collapses, this documentary presents a wide array of evidence both known and not known until now. Eight years later, some American people continue to live in an aftermath of 9 11 and deal with its ongoing repercussions. Is this just another machination of power on a timeline of history?

If so, a real question is what happens next? Or better yet, what can we do to prevent another 9 11? This film serves as a fundamental call to action which is fueled by hope that those affected by 9 11 will soon receive answers that they have sought after for nearly a decade.

This documentary film about some events of September 11, 2001 was created by Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe in 2009. This is actually a third edition of Loose Change 911, following Loose Change 911 second edition made in 2005 and an original Loose Change 911, produced in 2004. There are some additional video footage and information not available during previous versions in this release.

Berry Jennings interview is included in Loose Change 911: an American Coup. This video documentary is one of most popular September 11, 2001 documentaries, stipulating that 911 was an inside job. Are you not quite sure if 911 was an inside job?

911 Cover Up – Documentary Claims Illuminati Created False Flag

9/11: The Great Illusion is a documentary that proves that some events of September 11, 2001 were an inside job. Listen to objective, factual information in a documentary about 911. This film is intense!

911 was an inside job, planned, carried out, and covered up by some power elite from here in the United States of America. A professional two hour documentary with original musical score. 911 The Great Illusion was created by George Humphrey in 2007.

It is nearly two hours in length. Some alleged perpetrators of September 11, 2001 are illuminati according to this documentary. Whom exactly these illuminati are, I have no idea.

Perhaps it is just another label for powerful elite. A premise of this documentary is that some events of September 11, 2001 are being used for a certain group of people to take over the entire world. Mr. Humphrey also wrote a booklet that this documentary was based off of.

This 911 documentary points out various inconsistencies of the mainstream media’s coverage.
George Humphrey provides objective and factual information while asking relevant questions concerning some events which took place on September 11, 2001. This booklet gives a clear summary of those occurrences of September 11, 2001 uncovering “The Great Illusion” presented by predominate media.

An invaluable tool to use at a grass roots level. Starting with ourselves, we can restore sanity and justice, one person at a time. “The only way we are going to stop this freight train to tyranny is when enough people open their minds to the undeniable truth and have the courage to stand up for our nation and Republic.” –George Humphrey