911 Attacks – Are Land of Free and Home of Brave Absurd Slogans?

I was joined in an interesting chat about some events of September 11, 2001 in New York City. Was 911 indeed an inside job like many theories out there purport it to have been? We talked about how exactly we thought that both twin towers on September eleven two thousand one came down.

Another discussion talked about was what a thesis of controlled opposition is defined as. Are there really agents, cointelpro, provaceuters, etc. in society controlling opposition to government agendas, taxation, military, etc.? A list of individuals allegedly falling under definitions of controlled opposition were discussed.

Fear mongering was another topic of discussion. Does media, military, government, etc. use fear mongering tactics to get people to go along with their agendas? Fear mongering can be perhaps used in multiple ways for multiple reasons.

A global enslavement system was talked about as well. Many facets of this alleged global enslavement system was articulated. Are Americans really as free as they might think they are?

Is "the land of the free" and "home of the brave" absurd slogans? The United States government military loves to propagandize how free America is in contrast to other nations. Well when studying these other abstract nations, it has come quite clear that this notion of freedom in America is a distortion of reality.

America is just as oppressive as other nations on this planet. I do not see much differences in this part of the planet than in other areas that have a government military running things. America to me is one of the most corrupt nation states on Earth if not the most corrupt political entity.

American schools, history books, experts, government officials, media, etc. keep spewing off this absurd notion. Meanwhile more and more laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc. are created to keep Americans controlled and enslaved.

Political Dissent – Just What Exactly is Political Dissent?

Just what exactly is political dissent? Political dissent can come in various forms. People protest a current political system and still think it is advantageous to use it.

Other forms of political dissent may include protesting a political system entirely by advocating its abolishment. Politics etymology can mean many blood suckers. While I no longer participate in politics, I do endorse some form of political dissent.

However, watching any average protest, a person might quickly conclude that sometimes unexplainable events occur. For one thing police seem easily agitated and if a protest is large enough, almost always police threaten arrest if peaceful assemblies are not ended. It is almost as if this is some kind of turf war for police and they resort to war like tactics.

Another theme I have noticed with some larger protests is that out of seemingly no where violence erupts. A lot of times freedom fighters, anarchists, etc. are blamed. Well if you dig deeper, often times it is actual under cover police officers that instigate first bouts of violent behavior.

This leads me to my point that I think it is quite possible that most political dissent is steered by controlled opposition agents. Other labels for controlled opposition include cointelpro, emissary, spook, etc. Unfortunately, I think a lot of political dissent is controlled by outside sources.

Many groups you think are legitimate are often just preconceived controlled opposition organizations. There are countless secret societies, non governmental organizations, think tanks, political groups, philanthropy outfits, etc. that to me are just more group thinking controlled opposition. My premise is that established establishment lunatics know there will be dissent politically to a current oppressively corrupt system.

Therefore, they plan and prepare for any protesting and outrage by some citizenry. Things can escalate to a point that individuals get arrested and even charged, prosecuted, and sentenced in a corrupt legal system on trumped up charges. Political dissent is perhaps necessary in a current out of control oppressive system, but from my view point it can be dangerous at times.

False Positive HIV Results – Is Having HIV Equals AIDS a Myth?

Mario Coss joined me in discussing HIV AIDS. Mario provided information on a rapidly crumbling HIV equals AIDS myth. Beyond inherent flaws in an HIV equals AIDS theory.

A fact that HIV does not cause AIDS. It is a FACT that those very drugs which cost thousands and thousands of dollars are not only useless against AIDS, but actually are some of most toxic substances known in medicine. Don't think so?

Just look at an AZT label with a skull and crossbones warning label alerting you that even having those pills come in contact with your skin is justification in and of itself for contacting your local poison control center. That's new to you I bet. A basic concept is this, that AIDS drugs are in fact worse for you than no treatment at all.

People with NO treatment at all are always way better off than ones taking those drugs, which are actually not drugs for AIDS, but rather chemotherapy drugs that were being tested in 1960's and were literally too toxic to make any market. These are now being sold to poor folks who happen to test positive for a virus that has never been proven to cause AIDS, has never been isolated, and has thus never even been proven to exist.

I do not give out any advice about alleged Acquired Immuno Deficiency Syndrome, since I am not a medical expert. I do think it is important to think critically about alleged diseases in current society. Often times drugs prescribed for alleged diseases can be dangerous and have terrible side affects.

Are you interested in learning more about a possible false positive HIV story? If so, then you might want to watch a free twenty minute preview of the HIV AIDS Fact or Fraud movie documentary.