Sherry Jackson – Real Victim of Racism White Supremacy Terrorism?

Breaking the Invisible Shackles of the IRS by Sherry Peel Jackson, a certified fraud examiner and ex IRS agent. She Challenges all citizens to demand answers from Congress about legality of Federal income taxes and the Federal Reserve. Sherry claims that as an ex IRS agent, she was never able to find anywhere in an official Internal Revenue Service code, where it made paying income tax mandatory.

She was charged in two thousand seven and sentenced to a misdemeanor willful failure to file a federal income tax return. She spent thirty six months overall in prison from two thousand eight to two thousand eleven. Also, she had home detention and probation after her prison release.

Was Sherry Peel Jackson a scapegoat after she started to expose a possible income tax fraud? There have been other tax protesters and whistle blowers ie. Joe Banister, Larken Rose, etc. whom have not been charged and or imprisoned for exposing a possible income tax fraud. Since Sherry Peel Jackson is a "black" female, was it perhaps racism as well?

You can listen to her talk about her "show me the law" campaign that landed her in prison on Youtube. It is interesting that Amendment sixteen of the United States CONstitution, allows the United States federal government to tax citizens income. The sixteenth amendment was ratified coincidentally in nineteen thirteen, a same year that a current federal reserve was conceived.

There have been many people that have claimed a sixteenth amendment was never properly ratified by two thirds vote by members of Congress and or two thirds vote by state legislatures. Another argument is that income tax is not CONstitutional to begin with. If you think that there is no Internal Revenue Service code requiring United States citizens to pay income tax, then you might want to check out Sherry Peel Jackson's official blog.

Ripple Effect – Were an Alleged London 7/7 Attack an Inside Job?

7/7 Ripple Effect which covers an “alleged” terrorist attacks on July seven two thousand five in London, England.

Dear Viewer,

I hope this finds you well, in good spirit and having a good day. Regarding July seven two thousand five terrorist attacks in London, let us look at some facts, and what we were told, and compare them. Then, using Ockhams Razor and common sense, let us see what conclusions are to be drawn, so we can all understand what most likely really did happen that day.

Were those "alleged" terrorist attacks in London on July seven two thousand five an inside job? 7/7 Ripple Effect is about an hour long documentary which questions an "official" version of this event. It is interesting that an official version blames four muslims for this so called terrorist attack.

Where have we heard brown people being blamed for an alleged terrorist attack before? Oh that's right, those events of September eleven two thousand one which were blamed on nineteen brown terrorists with box cutters. There were some strange occurrences with that London incident.

For one thing, allegedly a bus route where so called terrorists perpetrated their crime, was never in operation until July seven two thousand five. Also, a security excercise exclusively for "terrorist" acts just happened to occur at same time as this alleged "terrorist" attack. Was this security exercise really staged so that this attack could be a false flag inside job?

Scheduling security drills during a false flag can cause confusion and can aid in an inside job scenario. Also, it is claimed that explosives used in this alleged terrorist attack were pre planted. A number thirty bus, which didn't exist before is a huge white flag, at least to my dogmatic subjective perspective.

There are other strange occurrences that are covered in this fifty six minute 7/7 Ripple Effect documentary. This documentary is easily available on the Internet by performing a google search or looking on video sharing sites like YouTube.com.

Live or Die Free – Tired of Fear in Mainstream & Alternative Media?

Live Free or Die radio show hosted by Lee Rogers from Oracle Broadcasting discussing an abstraction bill HR 645 and FEMA camps. Is Lee Roger’s show really the most dangerous talk show in America or more succinctly controlled opposition radio? It is interesting another patriot radio show host Bill Cooper was labeled the most dangerous radio show host in America in a white house memo by a former DeMolay Freemason and puppet traitor in chief Bill Clinton.

HR 645 was never passed into law and FEMA camps have been speculated by the truth movement. Was this broadcast just pure speculation or was it intentional fear mongering by an "ex" military whom served in Iraq? While I don't entirely refute a possibility of internment camps, as during World War II there were internment camps created for Japanese Americans.

My argument if it is indeed fear mongering and not accurate, then do some radio show hosts in a so called patriot movement use fear intentionally? Are these radio hosts trying to steer opposition from citizens fed up with an out of control government? Lets say hypothetically that the United States Federal government is creating FEMA camps, does scaring people really provide a solution?

It could well may be that Congress drafts bill's like HR 645 with an intention of creating fear in minds of citizens opposed to their agenda. Congress could just put that thought into your mind and some individuals may cave into that fear. Governments are known to instill fear into citizenry in order for them to make them submissive.

Whether FEMA camps are real or not, either way concepts like internment camps instill fear in some people. Over all I consider this kind of tactic quite distasteful. Clearly, there is some kind of agenda going on in my perspective by the alternative media.

Also, it is interesting that some main stream media hosts even talked about FEMA camps like Glenn Beck. Are you tired of fear mongering in mainstream media and even alternative media?

UPDATE: Oracle Broadcasting ceased operations on March 31, 2013.

Search For Truth – Is History Basically Lies and or Distortion?

An age old concept of searching for truth. Is history as told in books, magazines, newspapers, television, radio, etc. really as factual as portrayed? Is it really more succinctly basically lies or distortion of reality used against citizenry?

The more I study history the more I have come to a conclusion that history in my perspective is a brain washing propaganda campaign. Perhaps that is why you have some kind of truth movement after some events of September eleven two thousand one in downtown Manhattan, New York. History was literally rewritten about 911 after some extensive searching.

Have other historical facts really been distortions of reality used to control minds of your average citizen? Also, I have noticed certain individuals in society get highly defensive if you question historical facts. I would think it is hard to obfuscate each and every action in history.

However, I think certain actions that occur, when delving deeper seem to create more unanswered questions. How many times have you noticed that a piece of history is corrected in society? There are too many topics discussed in society as truth to cover in just one blog post.

Massaging the masses of human brains is perhaps an age old practice. To me one reason for lying about history or to put it another way, distorting reality is to control what one thinks. Perhaps if an individual really found out what happened they would be in for quite a rude awakening.

I question most history because I definitely think current reality is and has been distorted in my short life. If current written history is deceptive, then why wouldn't past history be wrong or not accurate. Some people argue that it is ridiculous to think history would be distorted intentionally.

My argument is that it makes sense with concepts like politics, government, military, etc. controlling a society.

Disclosure Project – Is This a Military Operation Spreading Fear?

Disclosure Project’s May nine, two thousand one press conference at the National Press Club. On Wednesday, May nine, two thousand one, over twenty military, intelligence, government, corporate and scientific witnesses came forward at the National Press Club in Washington, DC to establish a reality of unidentified flying objects or extraterrestrial vehicles, extraterrestrial life forms, and resulting advanced energy and propulsion technologies. Weight of this first hand testimony, along with supporting government documentation and other evidence, will establish without any doubt a reality of these phenomena.

Is the Disclosure Project really telling truth or is it a military operation used for fear mongering, red herring, divide and conquer, etc. Dr. Steven Greer whom is director of The Disclosure Project is known as a Central Intelligence Agency agent. Also, when I delved deeper into this group, almost every member and witness are either "ex" military or have government ties.

Why aren't doctors, lawyers, carpenters, at home mothers, etc. not witnesses? There evidence used as a basis where by The Disclosure Project claims that life forms from another planet are on Earth are just witness testimony and no physical evidence. The military has a long history of claiming that unidentified flying objects have been seen in America as well as the world.

It is also interesting that this Disclosure was made just a few months before the false flag inside job called 911 or those events of September eleven, two thousand and one. Project blue book was a popular United States military agenda that lasted sixteen years that basically investigated unidentified flying object sightings, claims, etc. MUFON also known as Mutual UFO Network is another organization that delves into studying alleged unidentified flying objects.

Are these organizations legit or red herrings used to distract from real important issues affecting society? Do they really solve any problems or do they create more problems by instilling fear, distractions, and mysteries that may never be solved?

Diamond Empire – Are Diamonds Really Forever or a Manufactured Con?

The Diamond Empire. This astonishing documentary investigates how an advertising slogan invented by Madison Avenue executives in nineteen forty eight has come to define our most intimate and romantic rituals and ideals. The Diamond Empire, which sent shock waves through a transnational diamond industry when it first appeared, systematically takes apart a myth that “diamonds are forever".

It exposes how one white South African family, through a process of monopoly and fantasy, managed to exert control over a global flow of diamonds and change a very way we think about courtship, marriage, and love; an achievement all more stunning given that diamonds are in fact neither scarce nor imperishable. Zeroing in on how “the diamond empire” managed to convert something valueless into one of most coveted commodities in history, this film provides a riveting look at how marketing and consumer culture shape not only global trade and economics, but also our very identities. Although, I'm not a big fan of the British bullshit corporation also known as BBC as it's part of the world wide propaganda media network.

However, the Diamond Empire is one of very few gems, pun intended broadcast on this propaganda channel. Is a diamond trade, which is basically completely controlled by two families, De Beers and Oppenheimer, enslaving Africans? Are diamonds really worth that much or just a manufactured con?

A diamond trade is much more nefarious and complex then just The Diamond Empire documentary, but still a good starting point into a corrupt diamond trade. It's also interesting that diamonds are allegedly plentiful on planet Earth. Another aspect that might not be well known is what actually takes place to make literally rocks sparkle.

Diamonds are useful besides just rocks to put on your finger after an engagement, wedding, etc. Diamonds can cut glass and are very useful when combined with water to cut certain materials. However, you would not know that by watching ridiculous commercials on television spewing off about how abstractly valuable they are.

Behold a Pale Horse – Was Bill Cooper a Danger to Establishment?

Milton William Cooper’s 1991 audio book titled Behold a pale horse. Was Milton William Cooper really the most dangerous radio host in America as outlined in a White House memo by a former puppet traitor in chief William Jefferson Clinton and announced by Rush Limbaugh? Also, was Milton William Cooper really a controlled opposition disinformation and or cointelpro agent used to keep the American people controlled and enslaved?

Another interesting aspect of William Cooper's book Behold a Pale Horse, is to me quite a bit of fear mongering. How much a threat really was Mr. Cooper to establishment lunatics? Why would a former DeMolay Freemason, Jesuit trained, and puppet traitor in chief Bill Clinton as well as an established media propagandist Rush Limbaugh attack somebody ex military?

There is no doubt that the United States government military has been out of control for decades if not since its inception. However, is an armed insurrection really an answer to this predicament? Was Milton William Cooper really a cointelpro agent with an agenda of fear mongering.

Fear is a tactic often time used by governments in order to terrorize into submission their victims also known as citizens. Since Mr. Cooper was both ex air force and ex navy, do his past military ties really make him a threat to an established corrupt system? To me it is not out of a realm of possibility that actually Mr. Cooper was a controlled opposition agent, whose sole responsibility was to steer any opposition to a current oppressive system.

Governments are known to use fear and to steer opposition to their tyrannical ways. Is it possible that Mr. Cooper with his prior military training was part of an established government military dictatorship and his sole job was to steer any opposition from his followers? His book in paper and audio format is readily available from websites like archive.org, YouTube, as well as other audio archive sites.

Treatments For HIV AIDS – Is HIV Equals AIDS a Fact or a Fraud?

HIV Equals AIDS Fact or Fraud movie documentary. HIV=AIDS: Fact or Fraud? One of most powerful video documentaries of our time boldly reveals a modern medical industrial complex’s dire descent into utter corruption.

This feature length expose explains exactly how a three hundred billion dollar AID$ fraud began, why HIV can NOT be the cause of AIDS, what some real causes could be, and who manipulates public’s good intentions while poisoning hundreds of thousands with toxic drugs that cause a very disease they are supposed to prevent. This is a systematic dissection of the HIV/AID$ machine and how they hijacked a program designed to fight a worldwide plight of human suffering and drove it down a road to hell. Yet this program offers hope, inspired by courage and articulate arguments of a group of growing voices internationally challenging the HIV=AIDS=DEATH hysteria.

A must see for anyone interested in truly understanding some facts about HIV/AID$. Stephen Allen produced and narrated this 1997 documentary about acquired immuno deficiency syndrome. He interviews scientist's like Peter Duesberg, about a possible AIDS mythology.

Is acquired immuno deficiency syndrome real or is it made up to target certain individuals with toxic medicine like AZT? This two hour documentary goes over whom and how acquired immuno deficiency syndrome was allegedly discovered. Microbiologists such as Mr. Duesberg are then interviewed as second opinions.

Also, what acquired immuno deficiency syndrome might be is also discussed. Historical AIDS data is presented in this documentary. HIV=AIDS Fact or Fraud was a ground breaking documentary that questioned the United States government's official explanation for how acquired immuno deficiency was discovered and what might really cause it.

Are you interested in watching this documentary? You can watch a free twenty minute preview of HIV=AIDS Fact or Fraud.

Andrew Joseph Stack – Was IRS Plane Crash a US Military Inside Job?

An “alleged” IRS tax plane crash that occurred on Thursday February 18th, 2010 in Austin Texas, an “alleged” lone gunman shooting of two middle school students on Tuesday February 23rd, 2010 in Littleton, Colorado, racism, white supremacy, and other subjects were discussed. Was that alleged Internal Revenue Service plane crash really an act of yet again a lone nut job? Was it really another false flag inside job perpetrated by the United States Government Military in order to justify more restrictions against Americans?

Joseph Stack supposedly crashed a Piper Cherokee PA-28 into an Internal Revenue Service building in Austin, Texas. Also, Mr. Stack allegedly burned down his house before crashing his plane into that Internal Revenue Service building. Vernon Hunter a black male perished from this incident.

After viewing "amateur" video coverage of this incident, I have quite a few doubts. Could a small Piper aluminum plane create all that damage as alleged by the United States Government Military? I am not disputing that Vernon Hunter lost his life or that perhaps even Andrew Stack did not perish.

I am disputing that this was an act of one person and physics involved. I was not there to witness, observe, or experience this supposed domestic terrorist act. Perhaps it was another terrorist act perpetrated by the United States Government Military.

The Deer Creek Middle school shooting did not include any fatalities. Bruco Strongeagle Eastwood was an alleged lone gunman nut job. Another school shooting allegedly perpetrated by a lone gunman.

This is not a first time that Deer Creek Middle school has been party to a school shooting. A similar incident occurred at this very same school in 1982. That time a student shot and killed another fellow student.

This 2010 shooting had some strange aspects, which are documented in Reality UnKnown episode #14. Are school shootings always just an act of a deranged lone gunman or gun woman? Are there more nefarious aspects to these shootings that the controlled news media does not report?

Bill Cooper – Was he a Controlled Opposition Disinformation Agent?

Milton William Cooper’s July second, nineteen eighty nine speech in front of the MUFON Symposium. Milton William Cooper also known as William Cooper also known as Bill Cooper discussed the “alleged” Secret Government, UFO’s, and MJ12. Was Milton Cooper really the most dangerous radio host in America or a controlled opposition disinformation agent and or cointelpro?

You can listen to a one hour and twenty eight minute replay of an “alleged” shadow government and UFO threat and decide for yourself, on popular video sharing sites like YouTube. Mr. Cooper quite extensively talked about and claimed he believed in UFO's for quite a few years. Later on in his career however he claimed he was duped by the United States government and no longer believed in them.

He did discuss seeing a UFO craft come out of some water while he was on a United States Navy ship. Why did Mr. Cooper perform a one hundred and eighty degree turn on this issue of UFO's? Were his initial reports of a UFO siting just erroneous then?

Perhaps stories like these were just a way to distract his listeners from more serious issues. Also, was Mr. Cooper really that dangerous of a radio host as alleged in a white house memo by then and former puppet Bill Clinton? How dangerous was he to any establishment, if he was discussing topics like UFO's?

Organizations like Mutual Unidentified Flying Object Network and Disclosure Project are riddled with "ex" military and government personnel. Perhaps topics like aliens and UFO's are perhaps red herring and or fear mongering rhetoric. Are persons such as Bill Cooper really disinformation agents used to control opposition to a current problematic enslavement system?