The sixteenth anniversary of the September 11 2001 false flag inside job attacks are just days away. New health information has surfaced claiming that children that breathed in dust near the world trade center complex, are now susceptible to possible heart disease. A research study was performed by New York University researchers about health affects of breathing in dust.
Three hundred and eight children had blood tests performed for analysis. One hundred twenty three of these children may have had direct contact to dust and fumes on September 11 two thousand and one. Chemicals found in this dust, that were measured at higher levels, is causing artery hardening fats in these children.
This report was scheduled to get released today September seven two thousand seventeen on the online version of Environment International. However, I tried to find this online report to no avail. I’m not sure why it has not been published online yet, since it is almost September eight two thousand seventeen at time of this blog post creation.
“Since 9/11, we have focused a lot of attention on the psychological and mental fallout from witnessing the tragedy, but only now are the potential physical consequences of being within the disaster zone itself becoming clear”
This is supposedly first study linking cardiovascular health problems related to the 911 attacks. This report claims that toxic chemicals from furniture and electronics burning may have created side affects to children that breathed in this air. These possible one hundred twenty three children’s blood, was compared to one hundred eighty five blood test samples from children that were not in Manhattan, New York on September eleven two thousand one.
Blood fats increased on average between nine to fifteen percent in children that breathed in dust. Higher than normal LDL fats can possibly cause greater risk of heart attacks and strokes. However, these risks maybe mitigated by taking certain health precautions.
“Our study emphasizes the importance of monitoring the health consequences from 9/11 in children exposed to the dust, and offers hope that early intervention can alleviate some of the dangers to health posed by the disaster,”
What a way to remember the sixteenth anniversary of the false flag inside job known as 911.
Multiple huge explosions at a hazardous materials warehouse owned by a Chinese company named Ruihai Logistics. Allegedly, seventeen people met their demise after two large explosions. These two explosions were so large they created huge mushroom clouds.
Firefighters were then eventually called off because fires and flames were too large and dangerous. Windows were shattered several kilometers away from these blast sites. A total of nine firefighters met their demise fighting these flames.
Around four hundred Chinese military terrorists are assisting with this disaster. Allegedly, they are helping with rescue and relief of victims. Some apartment buildings are within close proximity.
Just like in America, Chinese authorities have detained some Ruihai Logistics company officials, and perhaps treating them like criminals. Never mind this could have been just an accident. Video footage of this incident by some Chinese citizens show a couple huge orange mushroom clouds.
Many nearby buildings had all their windows blown out from these explosions. Tianjin China supposedly has a population of fifteen million people. Ruihai Logistics has been in business for four years since two thousand eleven.
This company has been approved to handle hazardous materials. Some buildings near these explosions had cracks in them. Also, some doors were blown off their hinges.
Allegedly, a first huge blast transpired from some shipping containers in this warehouse. This blast then caused another huge blast. These blasts then caused a huge mushroom cloud.
China’s official National Earthquake Bureau claimed their instruments detected one blast with equivalent of three tonnes of Trinitrotoluene and a second blast with equivalent of twenty one tonnes of Trinitrotoluene.
Federal bureaucrats are urging that white man Stewart Parnell receive a life long prison sentence today. Stewart Parnell, former Peanut Corporation of America President, knowingly allowed peanut butter to become sold that was tested for salmonella. Nine people died from this salmonella laden peanut butter.
His peanuts that he knew were tainted with salmonella also made over seven hundred people sick. He was convicted in September of two thousand fourteen and is just now being sentenced. A jury found this white food criminal, guilty of seventy one counts including conspiracy, obstructing justice, wire fraud, as well as other crimes relating to this salmonella outbreak that he created in two thousand eight.
A federal judge won’t dish out a sentence until September 21, 2015. Allegedly, this is first ever food poisoning case in an American court. This white man was never charged with murder or intentionally making people sick.
He knew those peanuts were infected with salmonella. Stewart Parnell has claimed he ate some of this peanut butter and even served some to his own family. Perhaps he was lying or trying to off his own family?
Peanut Corporation of America used falsified safety reports, in order to sell salmonella tainted peanuts to companies such as Kellogg’s. His brother Michael Parnell was also convicted but for less charges. Ken Hodges, Stewart Parnell’s lawyer calls a possible life in prison sentence “That recommendation is truly absurd”.
The fact this white man murdered nine people and injured over seven hundred but did not get charged for murder or is facing a death penalty to me is absurd. Perhaps this outcome is because he is white. We shall see how long he is sentenced for in September.
On November six of two thousand and twelve, Amendment sixty four passed by a majority of Colorado voters. This amendment is quite lengthy, but basically “legalizes” retail marijuana sales in Colorado. However, there are quite a few restrictions included.
You cannot smoke cannabis in public, can only grow up to six plants, and can carry up to an ounce of marijuana on your persons. These three quick rules, are just a tip of an iceberg, of quite a long laundry list of restrictions within this amendment. On November fifth of two thousand and thirteen, proposition AA passed, which created a ten percent retail sales tax on all retail marijuana purchases.
On May seventh of two thousand and thirteen, the Colorado State Legislature, a possible terror cell, passed a specific driving while stoned law. Basically, this law much like many other laws, is quite lengthy and stipulates that anyone caught driving with five nanograms of tetrahydrocannabinol or THC in their body, will be charged with driving under influence of drugs. Also, according to this law, anyone who declines a blood alcohol content test and urine analysis exam will have their driver’s license automatically suspended for one year.
Adding insult to injury a person also gets classified as a “persistent drunk driver”. Talk about your fifth amendment rights not existing. Another perhaps alarming aspect of “cannabis legalization” in Colorado is that even after amendment sixty four passed, multiple medical marijuana dispensaries have been raided.
As a matter of fact government military agencies such as the Drug Enforcement Agency, Internal Revenue Service, etc. have assisted local police and sheriff in Colorado, by stealing I mean raiding legitimate marijuana dispensaries even in two thousand and fourteen. Digging deeper I found out that federal terrorists, I mean agencies often times keep information about their raids a secret. I have read Amendment sixty four, a cannabis DUI law, and some search warrants for these raids and could not possibly cover all possible pitfalls with this so called cannabis legalization in Colorado, within this short blog post.
Some of the possible legal ramifications with amendment sixty four and a recently created marijuana DUI law are quite convoluted and complex. Did the colorado government really legalize cannibis? Is it a possibility that they have conned Colorado citizens and are possibly setting them up for stringent entrapment scenerios surrounding cannabis?
H. Edward Hanway was Cigna health care’s chief executive officer from January of two thousand until his retirement on December thirty first of two thousand and nine. In two thousand and seven, Cigna stingy care, I mean healh care became embroiled in a scandal involving seventeen year old Nataline Sarkisyan. Sarkisyan was in a desperate need of a replacement of her failing liver.
Also, she was ailing from complications of a previous surgical procedure. You see Nataline Sarkisyan was a leukemia patient. Nataline died on December twenty of two thousand and seven.
Cigna health care, under a guidance of H. Edward Hanway, refused to pay for her liver transplant initially. On that same day, within hours actually, that Nataline Sarkisyan perished, Cigna health care actually reversed their decision. By then it was too little too late.
Interestingly enough, H. Edward Hanway is actually a Jesuit and he graduated from Jesuit Loyola University Maryland. Nataline’s parents attempted to sue Cigna health care in two thousand and eight. This lawsuit was thrown out of a Los Angeles County district court due to a “Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux, 1987 U.S. Supreme Court ruling shielding employer-paid healthcare plans from damages over their coverage decisions”.
Dawn Smith, a woman of color, was diagnosed with a rare but treatable brain tumor in two thousand and five. For two years Cigna death care, I mean health care refused her treatment. As a matter of fact, they more than doubled her premium from three hundred and sixy six dollars and seventy five cents to seven hundred and fifty three dollars and forty seven cents.
Cigna death care decided to pay for some tests involving her brain tumor. However, in two thousand and nine, Cigna notified Dawn Smith that her anti epileptic medicine was increasing from ten dollars every two and a half months to one thousand one hundred and fifteen dollars. That is not a mistake, that is an eleven thousand and fifteen percent increase.
After some pressure, Cigna death care decided to return her epileptic medicine cost back to ten dollars every two and a half months. Chief extorter, I mean chief executive officer H. Edward Hanway refused to meet with Dawn personally in two thousand and nine. Dawn at time of this blog post from extensive searching is still receiving tests for her brain tumor.
Cigna death care never treated her brain tumor. Stacie Ritter is another casualty of Cigna health care’s stinginess. In two thousand and nine, her two daughters, whom had leukemia, needed daily growth hormone injections.
Once again, Cigna death care denied their treatment. In two thousand and three this Ritter family had filed bankruptcy due to mounting medical debt and a high COBRA premium. They obtained Crapna, I mean Cigna health care because of a medical insurance company change at their employer.
On October one of two thousand and nine, Stacie Ritter actually attempted to contact H. Edward Hanway at his main home 1005 Bent Road, in Media, Pennsylvania, zip code 19063. Of course this clown didn’t answer or perhaps he was too busy running this extortion racket, I mean large health care providor. Eventually, Cigna caved into pressure and are billing this family one hundred and forty dollars for three months of daily injections.
In conclusion, these are just three cases among countless under reported or not reported Cigna policy holder complaints. You see on December thirty one of two thousand and nine Jesuit H. Edward Hanway received a one hundred ten million and nine hundred thousand dollar retirement package. How is that for getting away with murder.
H. Edward scissor hands, I mean Hanway, owns four homes. A home, valued at five million dollars, at 160 16th Avenue in South Naples, Florida, a house at 166 72nd Street in Avalon, New Jersey assessed at ten million one hundred thousand dollars, and another house at 502 Saint Andrews Drive in Cape May, New Jersey, assessed at four hundred thirteen thousand six hundred and twenty six dollars using two thousand and nine real estate valuations. Cigna health care is actually an ancestor of the very first stock insurance company in America, Insurance Company of North America, which was founded in seventeen ninety two.
Cigna has notoriously terrible customer service ratings and one of the highest claims denial percentages in health care at a whopping thirty nine point six percent. At time of this blog post creation, Cigna has a lowest possible one star rating for customer satisfaction. Perhaps you could treat health crisis’ with natural treatments, or at a very least avoid Cigna death star.
The Great Global Warming Swindle movie documentary. Everything you’ve ever been told about global warming is probably not true. This film blows a whistle on a biggest swindle in modern history.
We are told that man made global warming is one of a biggest ever threat to mankind. There is no room for scientific doubt. Well, listen to this film and make up your own mind.
Is global warming really a threat to man kind? Is it a political agenda instead? If global warming does exist, is it really man made or perhaps naturally caused?
These are just a few questions that came to mind when trying to look into an alleged man made global warming theory. There are many scientists who now claim global warming is a false premise. Also, some scientists actually think perhaps the Earth is actually going through a cooling phase.
It is interesting to note that during the 1970’s another similar crisis was claimed as fact. This alleged crisis claimed that there was a global cooling problem. I have never really bought into a global warming crisis.
Especially, when I see it is a political agenda with possible nefarious consequences by government. This movie documentary, The Great Global Warming Swindle makes some very interesting points. With any subject is it not advantageous to at least hear more than one side of an issue?
From my perspective it seems as if global warming is crammed down our collective throats without any real debate. It could be perhaps another divide and conquer issue, where by primarily democrats are pro global warming these and republicans are not necessarily in agreement. Some people think that man made global warming or global warming for that matter is perhaps a fear mongering campaign, used to perhaps justify a carbon tax.
I think it is possible that government would use this issue to exert further controls on it’s citizenry.
Steve Allen, the producer of the movie documentary HIV=AIDS Fact or Fraud joined me to discuss his movie documentary and possible fallacy of an acquired immune deficiency syndrome epidemic. AIDS also known as acquired immune deficiency syndrome was allegedly first clinically observed in 1981 by Robert Gallo among others. In 1983 Margaret Heckler whom was Secretary of Health and Human Services, announced that HIV was a cause of acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
From this announcement forward, there have been some biologists, doctors, persons in medical fields, etc. that have questioned a validity of this claim by the United States government. Steven Allen’s documentary which was released in 1996, questions the United States Government’s official claim that human immunodeficiency virus causes AIDS. Not only does HIV Equals AIDS Fact or Fraud try to disprove HIV causing AIDS, but also documents what might actually cause acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
Mr. Allen discussed his documentary as well as fundamentals of a possible AIDS hoax. We discussed individuals from his documentary such as Dr. Peter Duesberg, Dr. David Rasnick, etc. He went over some statistics which may disapprove an official AIDS thesis, such as why yearly cases of acquired immune deficiency syndrome peaked many years ago.
The United States government military claimed AIDS would become a massive epidemic which might be refuted by a peak of cases long ago. Also, Steve Allen talked about a background of Robert Gallo, an alleged Knights of Malta and possible nefarious ties he has had during his career. Patient zero was discussed which is a nickname for an alleged single patient that was a basis for the HIV equals AIDS hypothesis.
Another aspect of a possible AIDS fallacy that was discussed were possible toxic pharmaceuticals like AZT that may do more harm than good. An acquired immune deficiency syndrome subject is far more convoluted and complex than certainly a blog post. Are you interested in learning more about a possible AIDS fallacy?
If so, you might want to listen to my two hour interview of the producer of HIV=AIDS Fact or Fraud Steven Allen. If that interview isn’t enough, you might want to watch a free twenty minute preview of his HIV=AIDS Fact or Fraud movie documentary.
Video documentary Controlling our food: The world according to Monsanto is a thought provoking, one hundred and nine minute documentary, first shown in two thousand eight in Europe, and is a must see for anyone concerned about a future of food. French documentary filmmaker Marie Monique Robin has thoroughly researched her subject, conducting a three year investigation in North and South America, Europe and Asia. Robin briefly explores Monsanto’s long history of producing toxic chemicals, such as PCBs and dioxin laced Agent Orange, and interviews victims of that company’s chemical operations.
This film devotes more attention to Monsanto’s twenty year old genetically engineered seed empire. Hitherto unpublished documents and candid interviews with scientists, farmers and former United States government officials reveal a disturbing pattern of deceit, impunity and corruption. Robin reveals Monsanto’s astonishing influence on the United States government’s rubber stamp regulatory process for genetically modified organisms, as well as its attempt to bribe Canadian government regulators to approve its bovine growth hormone product.
This film also features interviews of United States farmers sued by Monsanto for a newly minted crime of seed saving, Indian farmers victimized by that company’s expensive Bt cotton seed, and South American farmers marginalized by massive expansion of Monsanto’s Roundup Ready soybeans. Is Monsanto a clean, green company it claims being, committed to solving world hunger? Is its growing control of a world’s seed supply, it’s exorbitantly priced seeds and prosecution of farmers for saving them, and its commitment to spreading chemical intensive agriculture around the world, portend instead a threat to the world’s food security?
These are obviously important questions, and some little known perspectives provided by Controlling our food: The world according to Monsanto is essential information for anyone who is genuinely seeking answers. Do you think it is possible one corporation is trying to control the world’s food supply?
Video documentary Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World. A close examination into what many consider a “hoax”, aspartame toxicity. This documentary attempts to look at what is “definitively” known about aspartame and discovers that a label “hoax” in this case is a dangerous misconception.
In a journey through interviews with varous doctors, lawers, activists and victims, narrator Cori Brackett discovers symptoms to a much larger problem. Our institutions designed to protect a public from harmful substances have failed us. In a poisoned world, victims are found throughout the United States and are finally given a voice.
A close examination of a process for approving aspartame by the Food and Drug Administration leads to earlier examples of revolving door activity and how powerful corporations are influencing once trusted institutions. Today, resistance to aspartame continues, as a portrait of this poisoned world also offers hope and remedy.
Aspartame is a known toxin in many scientific circles. Former defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was on a board of G.D. Searle, whom invented Aspartame. The Food and Drug Administration had banned aspartame, but with help of Rumsfeld and a vote over turning that ban, Aspartame was an approved food additive.
Allegedly, Aspartame causes cancer among many other health problems. Many soda drinks like diet soft drinks and even Coke Zero contain Aspartame. Many citizens in America can’t imagine there own Government officials would approve of such a dangerous food sweetener.
They claim it would take too many people to practice a “conspiracy” of sorts. With Aspartame it took only a few individuals to get it approved. Whether you believe it is a toxin or not is a moot point if you believe everything the United States Government military tells you.
I guess one quick solution to avoid possible Aspartame poisoning, is to avoid it altogether. I’m not a medical expert, so a choice should be yours.