Knights Hospitaller – Are Some Knights of Malta Very Nefarious?

Order of The Knights of Malta

This documentary shows who and what the Knights of Malta are and their objectives. Their links to the Knights Templar and other secret societies are noted which focus on Rome as a great controller. This is an evil organization that is assisting in the New World Order.

Are some Knights Hospitaller also known as Knights of Malta involved in not so hospitable activity? This organization is quite old and dates back to twelve century. The Knights of Malta also have ties to the Knights Templars and are basically off shoots of the Knights Hospitallers.

Allegedly, they perform philanthropic activities in society such as literally hospital care, but some critics have noted that higher level knights are responsible for some of the corruption of the Vatican. They are a militarized religious order that is over nine hundred years old. This religious order has been renamed numerous times through out their history.

Currently their official name is Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta. This group was once known as the Knights Hospitaller, Knights of Saint John, Knights of Rhodes, etc. before acquiring their current name. Many people refer to them as the Knights of Malta currently.

The Knights of Malta also known as Knights Hospitaller were instrumental during great crusades. Some people think that this papal group is at war with muslims world wide once again. The Knights Templars are also rumored to having a feud with Hezbollah and Hamas.

It may very well be possible that these Vatican papal knights groups use good deeds as a front or a facade so to speak in order to cover for their more nefarious actions. Do you think that some Knights of Malta are nefarious?

Want to host your own Internet radio show? Reality UnKnown is looking for individual radio hosts that support being free, peaceful, and prosperous. Apply now and broadcast your voice for FREE.

Ryazan – 1999 Attacks Perpetrated by Russian Government Military?

Assassination of Russia

A fifty two minute documentary, using footage originally shot by NTV. This film examines September explosions, and focuses on a foiled bombing in Ryazan on September twenty second, nineteen ninety nine. It puts a human face onto this tragedy, you will hear from those who were there, saw it, and lived through it.

This film vividly portrays inconsistencies in government officials’ reactions to Ryazan, and their later attempts to consistently blame some Chechens. Questions about some possible involvement of special services are raised.

Bloody September

In September of Nineteen ninety nine, a series of middle of night explosions shook Russian cities destroying several apartment blocks. More than three hundred people died as they slept. These attacks, attributed to some Chechen terrorists, boosted popularity of a hawkish would be President Vladimir Putin.

Then, a strange thing happened. A bomb was defused by some local police, a trail of evidence leading to a door of Federal’naya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti, the Russian secret service. The Federal’naya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti was forced to admit “an ill-conceived exercise”.

Ever since, a question has lingered over Mr. Putin’s presidency: Who Done It? Why no one has been convicted of those September nineteen ninety nine attacks? Why was an investigation was suppressed?

Why have some witnesses disappeared? Why were some inquisitive journalists intimidated? Some critical television stations were also allegedly closed down due to talk that these events were possibly not perpetrated by Chechens.

Were nineteen ninety nine alleged Chechen attacks really Russian military events? Were these events so called inside job false flags, which were then blamed on Chechens? Several attacks that took place in late nineteen nineties have been suspiciously tied to Vladimir Putin and the Russian government military.

Do you think it is possible some nineteen ninety nine Ryazan attacks were acts perpetrated by Russian government military?

Monetary System – is Money Brain White Washing Control Mechanism?

Zeitgeist: Moving Forward, by director Peter Joseph Merola, is a feature length documentary work which will present a case for a needed transition out of a current socioeconomic monetary paradigm which governs the entire world society. This subject matter will transcend some issues of cultural relativism and traditional ideology and move to relate a core, empirical “life ground” attributes of human and social survival, extrapolating those immutable natural laws into a new sustainable social paradigm called a “Resource Based Economy”. Zeitgeist Moving Forward is a third installment of Peter Joseph Merolas’ movie documentaries.

This third installment of Zeitgeist series was released on January fifteenth two thousand and eleven. This documentary from my dogmatic subjective perspective dealt with solutions to a current problematic system in comparison previous two documentary films. One solution deals with a monetary system currently used on most of planet Earth.

The Federal Reserve monetary system whom many individuals now think influences economies world wide, basically uses coins and fiat currency. This system is viewed by many people as being nefarious and intentionally corrupt. A resource based economy allegedly will replace a current monetary system.

With that being typed, is money really just a brain washing control mechanism? Certainly there could be more prosperous ways to conduct human activity. Why has money been so prevalently used in past few centuries by countries, nations, states, etc?

Perhaps one reason is to control masses of people into using one system as a means to justify their enslavement. To me at least it makes sense that by having a central monetary system then one person or a group of people could easily manipulate this system for their benefit. I find it more nefarious than just greed for profits, but perhaps more succinctly as a way to control people.

Venus Project – Venus Project Real or United Nations Propaganda?

Is a Venus project a productive and potential replacement of a current system planet Earth is using? The Venus project is lead by basically Jacque Fresco and Roxanne meadows. They also have a perhaps symbolic relationship with the zeitgeist movement.

Venus project is centered around a resource based economy. A high tech civilization where allegedly all persons would be treated equal. Basically, concepts like money, politics, government would be phased out.

Cities would be built from a ground up and modernized when needed. Concepts like capitalism, communism, socialism would be phased out so that instead of constructing a controlled society a new society would be formed not out of power but necessity. Technology could be used to lessen death, famine, problems, etc. instead of creating more problems.

Basically, Venus project purports to have solutions for a current problematic system. Buyer beware though according to some, as there have been some alleged ties with Venus project to the United Nations. Why would a project that claims they want to dismantle social constructs like government meet with and associate with a world government body like the United Nations?

Jacque Fresco and his cohort Roxanne Meadows had met with officials from the United Nations and even attended an officially sanctioned United Nations event. Also, a resource based economy foundation had nefarious ties to the United Nations. Many individuals whom have read a United Nations agenda twenty one document have concluded that the Venus project could be United Nations agenda twenty one in disguise.

Perhaps it is up to each individual to decide whether or not the Venus project is a legitimate solution to a current conundrum. Do you think that a Venus project has real solutions or is it United Nations propaganda? Feel free to comment below about what your position is on this question.

Psyop – Do Governments Around World Create False Flag Attacks?

Do governments world wide create false flag terrorist attacks and then blame them on someone or some other country, nation, group, etc.? Psyop is defined when military actions are designed to influence perceptions and attitudes of individuals, groups, and foreign governments. Are psychological operations not just exclusive to the United States government military?

Some popular psyops that occurred in the United States of America are some events of September eleventh two thousand one, an Oklahoma City bombing on April nineteenth nineteen ninety five, and possibly a Boston bombing on April fifteen two thousand thirteen. When you start studying psyops and false flags, it is quite possible to me at least that psyops are not just exclusive to the United States government military. Some people have thought that an Oslo, Norway bombing and shooting on July twenty second two thousand eleven was another psyop false flag.

Critics of Russian President Vladimir Putin have alleged that Russia’s government had been responsible for Ryazan apartment bombings in nineteen ninety nine that were later blamed on Chechens. Allegedly, this may have been carried out by Russian Federal Security Service also known as Soviet Union’s former KGB. Another interesting allegation is that a drill by Federal Security Service was carried out on that day.

In two thousand two there were explosions in Bali which were blamed on extremist Indonesians. It later surface that Australian federal police, the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the United States agents, and United Kingdom special agents had prior knowledge of possible bombings. Shortly after anti-terrorism legislation was enacted and Indonesia decided to enter troops into Afghanistan all under a false guise pun intended of terrorism.

Do governments around the world create false flag attacks?