Cover up in Oklahoma
This documentary examines eyewitness accounts and news media reports documenting a bombing of the Alfred Paul Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City on April nineteenth nineteen ninety five. Included with this presentation is a video affidavit of bombing survivor Jane C. Graham and her sightings of strange individuals in the Alfred Paul Murrah building prior to that tragic event.
Mind The Gap
It is now clear that false flag operations are part of a strategy of tension designed to instill fear in a civilian population and create unprovoked hatred towards groups of people labeled minority or non-whites. A documentary detailing gaps in an official story of the July seven two thousand five London bombings that demand further attention. This film, presented by ex MI5 whistle blower David Shayler, whom many people consider controlled opposition, argues a need for an independent public inquiry into those July seven two thousand five and surrounding events.
Was an Oklahoma City bombing that occurred on April nineteen of nineteen ninety five a false flag inside job? It is interesting to note that Timothy Mcveigh was “ex” military whom served in a first Iraq gulf war in nineteen ninety to nineteen ninety one. Timothy Mcveigh was allegedly deployed to provide personal security for then General “Stormin Norman” Schwarzkopf.
I find it strange that a former soldier that provided protection for a former general and served in a first Iraq Gulf War would then perform a one hundred and eighty degree turn and attack one of its own so to speak. Perhaps Timothy Mcveigh was used as a patsy during this false flag inside job attack. Initial reports were that up to three explosive devices went off and or were found.
News media outlets then changed an official story and declared a fertilizer bomb was used inside a Ryder truck. Was an April nineteen nineteen ninety five Oklahoma City bombing an inside job?
Want to host your own Internet radio show? Reality UnKnown is looking for individual radio hosts that support being free, peaceful, and prosperous. Apply now and broadcast your voice for FREE.
Fool me Twice
Exposing the Australian government’s lies about some east Timor massacres, a cover up of some Bali bombings, including the nineteen ninety three New York World Trade Center attack, and subsequent anti terror legislation forced through parliament. “Fool Me Twice” examines well known examples of false flag terror, and adds an excellent new sequence about a nineteen ninety three World Trade Center bombing that leaves a viewer with no doubt that Emad Salem was a controlled asset. Utilizing audio that features Salem covertly recorded while talking with Federal Bureau of Investigation agent John Anticev, “Fool Me Twice” cuts to a chase regarding a nineteen ninety three New York City World Trade Center bombing, and goes deeper, examining the Central Intelligence Agency links to this milieu.
Indonesia’s former president Abdurrahman Wahid has said his nation’s police or military officers may have been involved in that two thousand two Bali bombings which killed two hundred and two people. As Australia marked a third anniversary of that nightclub attacks in which eighty eight Australians died, Wahid told Special Broadcasting Service television’s Dateline that he fears there are links between Indonesian authorities and terror groups. On that program, which aired later, he said that while terrorists were responsible for a first bomb which went off on October twelve two thousand two, a second blast may have been organised by authorities.
Asked who had planted a second bomb, he said: “Maybe the police… or the armed forces”. Associated Press and Reuters quickly linked these bombings to Al-Qaeda. Was this an accurate assessment or a mere cover up of whom was really responsible?
Was the Australian government, military, intelligence agencies really behind those October twelfth two thousand two bombings? Was it really Indonesia’s government, military, intelligence agencies behind those bombings like a former Indonesian President alluded to? Perhaps it was a combination of both or just one entity behind those bombings and not Al-Qaeda or any other Islamist group.
Were some October twelve two thousand and two Bali bombings an inside job false flag attack?
On seventh of July two thousand five, London was hit by a series of explosions. You probably think you know what happened that day. But you don’t.
The police have, from an onset of their investigation, chose to withhold from a public almost every bit of evidence they claim to have and have probably lied about several aspects of those London Bombings. A mainstream news has wilfully spread false, non substantiated and not verifiable information, while choosing to completely ignore numerous inconsistencies and discrepancies in an official story. The British government has finally presented us with their official narrative concerning this event.
Within hours it was shown to contain numerous errors, a fact since admitted by the British Home Secretary John Reid. They have continuously rejected calls for a full, independent public inquiry. Tony Blair himself described such an inquiry as a ludicrous diversion.
What don’t they want us to find out? There was just coincidentally a terror drill being performed at same time these alleged explosions took place. Also, bus number thirty that these alleged explosions took place on was not a bus route in operation until July seventh two thousand five.
There was very little closed caption television footage released by the United Kingdom government after this alleged terrorist attack. This attack was blamed on Al-Qaida and more specifically four British muslim males. There was no closed caption television footage proving these muslim men perpetrated this event.
Only evidence was some photos of some of these men, but never any photos or video with definitive proof. With such a lack of evidence the British government continued to claim these suspects were the perpetrators. Were July seventh two thousand five bombings a false flag attack?
If you think this is possible you might want to listen to Ludicrous Diversion available on popular video sharing sites.
Natural capitalism is perhaps an oxymoron or maybe a more accurate definition of what could transpire. Currently, capitalism to me is not creating prosperity but actually causing poverty. Could abolishing a current capitalistic system actually create real prosperity?
Using money and passing around pieces of paper not only is a waste of time but actually is a control mechanism. Certain people on planet Earth have most of these pieces of paper. Other persons on this planet have very little money and barely survive.
One problem perhaps is finding a system to replace capitalism. There are ideas like a resource based economy where money wouldn’t me used. Going back to bartering and trading is also talked about by some people.
Then there is what I consider not necessary fear mongering about what could happen if capitalism was no longer used. To me it could be advantageous if people had more choices. Some humans could barter, some could trade, and some could still use money.
Having choices could further alleviate any potential problems of just pulling a capitalistic rug so to speak. If multiple economic systems functioned at once, then maybe there would be less and less problems, until finally most problems would disappear. One other issue I see is people even embracing a new or newer systems.
Perhaps humans are so used to capitalism that they cannot envision any other way of providing for themselves. Certainly there is a more natural way of humans prospering? Capitalism to me is too corrupt and manufactures poverty.
It seems as if there are only a few individuals that are truly prospering where as a great majority are mired in despair and poverty. Perhaps even noticing a problem with capitalism is a revolutionary thought at this point. Eventually, maybe more humans will realize how dangerous capitalism has been.
Can abolishing capitalism create prosperity?
David Icke Debunked
This two and one half hour film takes a very close look at David Icke’s history and beliefs. It reveals true sources of David Icke’s theories which are often shocking, and should be very concerning for a genuine seeker of truth. This is a well rounded expose which is done respectfully, while still attempting to get an average truth seeker to reevaluate what they really know about an “endgame” of an Illuminati.
Chris White produced this film documentary with a critical analysis of David Icke. Basically, David Icke Debunked is an expose of Mr. Icke’s previous works, background, history, etc. David Icke is a former footballer or soccer player.
Also, he was a British Broadcasting Corporation sports announcer for years. Mr. Icke claimed he was a son of god on the British Broadcasting Corporation which raised some eyebrows. He has claimed that the moon is not real but merrily a hologram.
Icke had a short stint in politics with the British Green party in late nineteen eighties and early nineteen nineties. In recent years David Icke has been a critic of an alleged one world government also known as the New World Order. Mr. Icke also delves into conspiracies, such as some events of September 11, 2001.
In a so called truth movement their is some speculation that David Icke is a controlled opposition agent. Chris White’s expose discusses this as well as many facets of Mr. Icke. An alleged Illuminati whom ever they may be is covered as well.
Is their such a thing as Illuminati and or a New World Order for that matter? Illuminati and New World Order are phrases popular among conspiracy thinkers, alternative media, and a self proclaimed truth movement. Do you think that David Icke is a controlled opposition disinformation agent?